Hi, hier sollten wir auch Ausschau halten. ID hat in der letzten version ein sehr umstrittenes Feature bekommen das alle Gebäude die Nahezu rechteckig sind angemault werden. Das für wie jetzt hier dazu das MASSENHAFT Gebäude "ge-rechteckt" werden. Ich halte das für keine gute Idee so massiv durch die Gegend zu pflügen - da kommen dann schnell die Gebäude unter die Räder die wirklich nicht rechteckig sind. Also Augen auf. Flo ----- Forwarded message from Jmapb <jmapb@gmx.com> ----- Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 11:13:49 -0400 From: Jmapb <jmapb@gmx.com> To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] mass iD validation arrives in NYC See yesterday's changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676813 ( https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676813 ) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70676888 ( https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70676888 ) I believe this is just a casual user browsing around in iD and making the suggested changes it advises -- to about 1000 objects. These giant changesets are nearly impossible to review. My fear here is that iD's new validator will make QA extremely challenging in dense areas. Scrolling through the tag additions, these changesets look almost identical to the behavior of a bot... or rather like 6 or 7 bots operating at once. If they *had* been made by a bot that was following the mechanical edit guidelines, they could be comprehended and reviewed. But the various tagging changes are all mixed up together in a single changeset, along with whatever the mapper reidpelton's *actual* changes were -- if any. So how do I even begin to do QA on this? I don't see any options other than 1) mass-revert or 2) skip review of all large changesets that appear to be triggered by iD validation. Any other suggestions? Jason _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Florian Lohoff f@zz.de UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away